Date: October 22, 2021
Subject: Arts & Humanities Climate Survey Results
Dear Arts & Humanities Colleagues,
Harvard University strives to create an environment that supports diversity, promotes an inclusive culture, and establishes a sense of belonging for each member of our community. An important element of promoting a supportive, inclusive culture is understanding the lived experiences of our community members.
In the spring of 2021, we asked our 21 Arts & Humanities departments and programs to work with the Divisional office and the Harvard College Office of Institutional Research (HCIR) to develop a climate survey for the members of their communities. The survey was designed to help us understand the challenges that we face in our academic communities and working environments and how best to address them.
The A&H departmental climate surveys were administered in Qualtrics by HCIR, sent to faculty, staff, graduate students, and undergraduate concentrators, and 960 respondents participated. With 2,137 community members invited, we had a total participation rate of 44.9% (specific population participation rates can be found on page four of the quantitative report). The quantitative summary report aggregates the results. The three constituency reports – for faculty, staff, and graduate students – highlight themes surfaced by qualitative comments. My thanks to the HCIR team for developing, administering, and analyzing the department-specific climate surveys. And thank you to everyone who participated in the process.
I urge you to read and digest these results. There is some good news. Overall satisfaction with job/work/academic experience is high across students, staff, and faculty (at a rate of 86%). Responses to the interpersonal justice questions were exceptionally heartening, with over 90% of respondents indicating that they feel that they are treated with dignity and respect by members of their department. In general, members of our A&H community report feeling valued (80%) and accepted (85%). More than 4 out of 5 also report that differing points-of-view and opinion are respectfully heard and considered (83%). Ideally, of course, we would be even closer to unanimity on these matters, but at least we are starting from a strong base.
There are notable variants within these majority results that call for careful interpretation and responsive action, particularly where we see correlations between results and demographics. Graduate students, female faculty, and faculty identifying as Asian report a more negative climate across most issues. In some cases, the difference is stark.
-
Graduate students lag behind faculty, staff, and undergraduates in having a sense of belonging within their departments (51% report feeling that their departments have a strong sense of community, and this number falls to just 33% among female graduate students). The percentage affirming that their department has demonstrated a commitment to diversity is also smaller, and nearly a third report feeling that they have been treated differently based on their identity. Graduate students have the lowest level of agreement in areas of accountability for wrongdoing, with only 38% indicating that there are clear reporting channels and just 24% feeling that there is a clear process for resolving conflicts. Perhaps more concerning is the finding that more than half of our graduate students indicated they would fear retaliation for coming forward with a complaint. These results are often worse among our female and non-binary graduate students.
-
Female faculty report higher rates of perceiving different treatment based on their identity (30% compared to 15% among male faculty). They also rate their departments much lower on the accountability for wrongdoing metrics than do their male colleagues, with a gap of between 15 and 20 percentage points. When it comes to incivility, 59% of female faculty report experiencing incivility compared with 40% of male faculty.
-
Faculty identifying as Asian report overall satisfaction at a rate far below those of faculty identifying as URM, White, or who did not disclose race. Just 50% of Asian faculty feel their department has a strong sense of community. They also report feeling less well respected by their faculty colleagues and by departmental leadership and less comfortable than their faculty colleagues with raising ideas and dissenting views.
The linked issues of sense of community, professional conduct, and accountability are of concern across all sectors of our community. Only 62% of respondents report feeling a strong sense of community in their department. While 24% feel that they have been treated differently based on their identity, this number jumps to 67% among our non-binary staff. 61% of participants would feel comfortable coming forward with complaints or grievances without fear of retaliation. Only 49% think we have clear channels for reporting behaviors while just 37% think we have a clear process for resolving behaviors. And the majority (56%) of survey participants report experiencing a form of incivility, from condescension to exclusion, unprofessional terms, and harassment. Among those reporting incivility, approximately 2/3 of them report multiple occurrences. Our community will never be perfect, but we can – and must – do better.
As part of our Divisional commitment to transparently address issues of inclusion and belonging in our departments, we will be hosting three conversations for specific constituencies within the Arts & Humanities:
-
For Faculty, on Thursday, October 28, at 4pm
-
For Staff, on Wednesday, November 3, at 4pm
-
For Graduate Students, on Thursday, November 4, at 4pm
These meetings will provide an opportunity to discuss the Divisional findings of the climate survey with a particular focus on each population’s survey themes and experiences. You will receive a separate invitation for your conversation soon.
These constituency conversations will mark the start of a series of efforts to bring more inclusivity, civility, accountability, and community into our departments and programs. We will share news and updates in the conversations on existing and upcoming resources and opportunities for workshops and trainings.
Your departmental chairs have had the opportunity to speak with representatives from HCIR and the Center for Workplace Development to help formulate strategies for developing a plan of action within each unit. We have made funds available for departments to host community-building events, and we will host a lecture series on issues of Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging in spring 2022.
In addition, departmental Faculty Liaisons for Inclusive Excellence (FLIEs) will be making the findings of the departmental climate surveys a part of their agenda for the year. This group will work with the FAS Associate Dean for Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging, Sheree Ohen, and her team to link our efforts to expertise and experience in this domain.
We will continue to hold ourselves to the highest standards of intellectual rigor. Doing so involves vigorous discussion and debate, often between people who disagree. I want to emphasize my support for healthy and vibrant intellectual discourse, but also want to stress Harvard’s expectations for professional conduct. We have a shared responsibility to establish an intellectual climate in which, as Dean Khurana likes to say, we can disagree without being disagreeable, and be hard on the problem while being easy on each other. This will allow ideas and careers to flourish at Harvard. The appended reports are a call to action for us all, and I ask for your support as we move forward with lasting and sustained institutional change.
If you have any questions or would like to share feedback about the report, please email us at arts-hum@fas.harvard.edu.
With best wishes,
Robin