The Public Culture Project
The Public Culture Project, housed in Harvard’s Division of Arts & Humanities, aims to revivify our shared public life by placing existential, moral and even spiritual questions at the center of our public conversations. We want to mine the deep insights, traditions and longings of our fellow citizens, and inspire current and future leaders to develop and advance beautiful, humane visions of who we are, and what we can become together.
Why Public Culture?
By many measures, we live in a moment of cultural disintegration. Here in America, trust in our institutions and one another has been plummeting for decades. Polarization has skyrocketed, and cross-partisan conversation has come to seem all but impossible. Rates of loneliness, anxiety, depression, drug overdose and suicide are on the rise. A recent Harvard study found that a majority of young adults report lacking a sense of meaning and purpose that could give shape to a life, or to a shared vision of society. Many of our most valued and powerful institutions seem bereft of leadership or vision. In the midst of all this wealth, technology and information, it feels like we are adrift, and possibly coming apart.
The belief that our public life can be guided by simply “following the numbers” - whether in the form of big data, share price or algorithms - has left our public life feeling sterile and inhumane, and opened the door to destructive and even violent ideologies. We believe that the time is right for people of good will to re-engage perennial questions about the human condition, the shape of a good life, who we are as a people, and who we want to become. We want America’s oldest university to play host to these kinds of conversations, which are so badly needed in our time and place.
What We Do
The Public Culture hosts regular public conversations, bringing prominent leaders from government, business, technology, religion, medicine and media into conversation with thinkers from the arts and humanities. Our project is deliberately cross-partisan, welcoming good-faith thinkers and leaders from across the ideological spectrum to engage philosophical, moral and even spiritual questions in an honest, open, creative spirit. We are especially interested in groupings that will catalyze generative, surprising, open-hearted conversations. We might, for instance, pair a Democratic Senator with a Republican Governor, or a tech visionary with a spiritual leader, to engage deep and broad-ranging questions like the following:
- What are education and work for? As we continue to build the capacity of AI, what sort of learning and jobs do we want for our children?
- Why are men and women drifting apart, in education, work and politics? What do we want gender relations to look like?
- How central are religious or philosophical beliefs and practices to a flourishing life and a solidaristic society? Might we see another Great Awakening?
- What moral principles are shaping our economic life? Are they the principles we want?
This project also has an inward-facing aspect. We want to open these important questions for the students we are charged with educating, so that they can take them with them into their lives and careers.
Ideas of America: 250 Years of Public Culture
Crutch or Catalyst? How AI Is Changing the Ways We Relate
Waiting for Light in the Dark: Art and Spirituality on Hope in Dark Times
What Rough Beast…? On AI’s Potential to Surpass Humanity
The Future of Humanistic Learning
What Remains: AI, Death, and Loss
Hope of the Intellect? Thinking and Seeking Possibilities in Politics
‘Digital resurrection’ leaves legal, moral questions to the living
For the grieving, speaking with a loved one who has died can be a compelling prospect. But as AI becomes increasingly capable of creating chatbots or avatars simulating the voices, faces, and speech patterns of the dead, scholars are left confronting the legal and moral implications of what some call “digital resurrection.”
“I completely understand, as both a legal scholar and on a very deep human level, the drive that folks would have to do more than just hear their grandmother’s voice or their spouse’s voice or their child’s voice,” said Leah Plunkett, Meyer Research Lecturer on Law and Associate Dean of Learning Experience and Innovation at Harvard Law School “It is a growing industry now.”
Find the full article by Eileen O'Grady on the FAS Current website.
Photo by Carlos Sanchez via FAS Current.
Embrace screens or teach ‘marathon powers of attention’?
When humanistic education is at its best, students approach the classroom with enthusiasm, with the spirit of collective inquiry.
At worst, panelists told a Sever Hall audience, it can look like low enrollment, low enthusiasm, and low willingness to participate in class discussions.
“There’s nothing that we can do in the classroom that’s as entertaining as Instagram reels,” said Madeline Baker, College Fellow in the Department of the History of Science. “If we play this attention economy game, we’re going to lose.”
Find the full article by Eileen O'Grady on the FAS Current website.
Photo by Conrad Kenemuth via FAS Current.
Is there a philosopher in the house?
Artificial intelligence advances daily. Right now, humans, with our values and beliefs, are the decision-makers who set the agenda, form relationships, create culture. There is a growing sense of profound discomfort over the fact that AI soon may take over some of that. What is our place when we are no longer solely at the center of things?
That was the question at the heart of a panel co-hosted by the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society and the Division of Arts and Humanities’ Public Culture Project.
“I think we’re going to start seeing a lot of exciting applications [for AI] coming out … but it’s important to talk about this in a way that respects what it is to be human,” said panelist Ken Archer, product lead in responsible AI at Microsoft.
Find the full article by Sy Boles in the Harvard Gazette.
Photo by Niles Singer via the Harvard Gazette.
Anthropic and Microsoft Researchers Weigh Limits of Artificial Intelligence at Berkman Klein Panel
Researchers from Anthropic and Microsoft split on the limits of artificial intelligence during a Berkman Klein Center panel on Monday, two days after Anthropic’s chief executive urged AI companies to slow down their work.
The panel is the first in a series focused on how AI is reshaping relationships, beliefs, and creativity, and drew more than 100 attendees. It came on the heels of a statement from Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei that urged AI developers to slow the pace of capability advances so safety work can keep up — a position Sam Altman of OpenAI and Elon Musk have since echoed.
Find the full article on the Crimson website.
Photo by Crimson Multimedia staff via the Crimson website.